Article written

  • on 01.06.2010
  • at 11:24 AM
  • by Joe Osborne

Lincoln High students’ attitudes match new building 0

Jun1

LincolnOsborne

What is it that motivates, or fails to motivate, an adolescent to learn? Both the Pennsylvania School Board and Abraham Lincoln High School, located on Ryan and Rowland avenues, opted to explore a possible answer to this question by completely restructuring the 60-year-old building.

According to project manager JCMS Inc., the renovation waves a price tag of $70 million on the recently finished construction of the new school building in September 2009.

“It speaks to a building that was tired and in need of replacement, but we’re not alone,” Thomas J. Dougherty, assistant principal of Lincoln, reflects. “I can’t really point my finger on how or why Lincoln got chosen. I’ve been to schools before that to this day remain in the ‘20s.”

LincolnOsborne2While Dougherty cannot provide a singular reason for the ambitious project, he mentions that asbestos within the aged building was a prime motive. Issues like truancy and student violence were prevalent within the old building, but no longer, Dougherty said.

“The number of infractions have decreased enormously in all levels, be it student assault or it be assault on an employee. Even cutting, for that matter, has decreased,” Dougherty continued.

Demolition still continues with plans to convert the building’s original acreage into sports fields by this September. Both the raucous demolition and the fresh, orderly building are believed to have had a visible effect on student morale.

“The young folks will hold the door. In the past that didn’t mean a whole lot, but it is significant,” Dougherty said. “It says something to me of the respect for their peers and other adults to go that distance.”

The innovative building has a wing dedicated to ninth grade classes, a group that suffers from immense dropout rates across the nation, according to English Department Head Rayna Goldfarb. However, as Goldfarb points out, it takes more than a new building to transform the way that high school students approach education.

“It’s the transition from middle school to high school where kids have to function independently; they have more autonomy and they’re profoundly immature,” Goldfarb stated without doubt.

LincolnOsborne3

As Dougherty said, there are mixed feelings among those who knew the outdated building regarding the renovations. The demolition has proved to be a minor disruption to students who occasionally can hear the clamor, as well as feel the vibrations, of the former building as it falls, Goldfarb said.

With everything from several Mac computer labs to a state-of-the-art health education classroom available to Lincoln’s students, school officials hope to deter the small number of students who still wander in and out of the building.

“What is it within a child that makes them want to do better and some kids just sort of get swept away?” Goldfarb puzzled. “I don’t know, and this building cannot fix that.”

Joe Osborne is a student in Temple University’s Philadelphia Neighborhoods class — a journalism program designed to encourage students to cover under-reported neighborhoods. Joe is a Northeast native.

  • http://www.kearney2010.com Tim Kearney

    Spending precious tax money on a modern high school building is a good thing. Philadelphia students deserve updated buildings, whether through building new, or refurbishing the older buildings. We could modernize more school buildings, if we did not waste so much money on corporate welfare like new stadiums for incredibly wealthy professional sports monopolies, who can easily afford to build their own stadiums. As for why Lincoln HS? 1) Our state Representative was the Speaker and his party controlled the School Reform Commission, and he used a new school as a way to reduce the student body population.

  • http://philadelphianeighborhoods.com Joe Osborne

    I couldn’t agree more, Tim. I can only imagine of the incredible improvement that would come to Philadelphia if only more state funding went to improvements on education.

    As for reducing the student body population, I’m not sure what you’re referring to. Do you mean the amount of students that get bused in from other neighborhoods to Lincoln was reduced?

  • Donny

    Joe, the new Lincoln is much smaller than the old one. Based on what I was told, the new Lincoln was supposed to be built for students living in the immediate area, and bussing was to either be eliminated or drastically reduced.

  • http://philadelphianeighborhoods.com Joe Osborne

    I did notice the difference in size. That’s funny that you mention that as my contacts didn’t mention that little tidbit. Hmmm, thanks for the tip!

  • Pingback: Phila Pa, Lincoln hs demolition

  • joe

    all the high schools were decent till busing started ,it effected the neighborhoods inturn ,recreation centers ,movies, shopping centers,enterainment places. the problems were never solved just spreadout.

  • Howard

    I graduated from Lincoln in 75’ and was sad to see that the old building was torn down. Things sure have changed a lot since then. Good luck to the students with the new building. My memories will live in the old one.

  • e kess

    This is not a cheap shot against the high performing teachers who practiced there between 1968 and 71 when I attended, because I had a few, TOO FEW.. My year book featured them on strike !! They for the most part were more interested in their benefits than reaching hard to motivate students such as myself. But that’s exactly what they are supposed to earn their pay for – reaching and teaching the hard cases. The A students in my classes needed no special help – yet those teachers were glad to accept the credit for those students academic excellence, which they earned for the most part on their own accord. Too many of my teachers long ago lost their motivation for many reasons, many not of their own causing. But they did not “soldier on”, as we expect our MILITARY to do, regardless of the conditions. NO EXCUSES. I do not harbor ill will, I view them as pathetic failures of a UNION oriented force that is self focused rather than student focused. UNIONS protect the marginal performers – who should have been made to find some other form of manual labor. Lastly, I have no doubt that a building can improve morale, but it’s a mistake to misplace success or failure on lifeless things. It is the people inside that make an institution a success or an abject FAILURE. We shall see about the new Lincoln in 10 years, until then the verdict is on hold.
    I was lucky I became motivated late in my senior year, not the preferred or best course of action, but nonetheless in large part due to the sole efforts of a Guidance Counselor Mr Puckett. I earned a A.S. degree from CCP and a B.A. from La Salle Univ, as well as 30 years with in the federal law enforcement / military arena. I was one of the lucky ones I succeeded despite Lincoln for which I hold both fond memories of childhood as well as not so fond ones because of a severely crippled teaching structure corrupted by unionization. Bottom line..People need to rise or fall based on continuing reassessment of merit, when you stop performing you are gone !!!
    The time for a self serving – alleged elite – phony aristocracy has long passed. Young people need to be shown excellence by example, that my fellow citizens start with parents and is reinforced by teachers.
    My rant is don, Thank You. E Kess

NEast Philly is powered by WordPress and FREEmium Theme.
developed by Dariusz Siedlecki and brought to you by FreebiesDock.com

More in Features (123 of 186 articles)